Aluminum vs Composite Crossarms
Aluminum crossarms are the proven standard — strong, light, and economical. Composite (fiberglass) crossarms add corrosion immunity and electrical non-conductivity, valuable in coastal, corrosive, or high-voltage environments, at a higher cost. For most sports installs aluminum suffices; composite is a specialty upgrade.
This comparison helps you choose the crossarm material.
At a glance
| Aluminum | Composite (fiberglass) | |
|---|---|---|
| Strength / cost | Strong, economical | Strong, higher cost |
| Corrosion | Resistant when anodized | Immune |
| Electrical | Conductive | Non-conductive |
How to choose
Choose aluminum for standard inland installs — it's the proven, strong, economical choice for the vast majority of sports lighting, and anodizing provides corrosion resistance. Choose composite where corrosion or electrical non-conductivity is a real concern — coastal salt air, corrosive industrial environments, or high-voltage proximity — accepting the higher cost for those specific benefits. The decision is environment-driven: most projects don't need composite, but where conditions are harsh, its corrosion immunity earns the premium.
Frequently asked questions
What's the difference between aluminum and composite crossarms?
Aluminum is the proven, strong, economical standard (corrosion-resistant when anodized); composite adds corrosion immunity and non-conductivity for harsh or high-voltage environments at higher cost.
When should I use aluminum?
For standard inland installs where strength and economy matter.
When should I use composite?
Where corrosion or non-conductivity is a concern — coastal, corrosive, or high-voltage environments.
Are composite crossarms worth the cost?
In harsh or high-voltage environments, yes; otherwise aluminum suffices.
Do crossarms affect EPA?
Yes — crossarms add their own EPA, which counts toward the pole's total wind load.
Ask about mounting hardware with a free design. Get it at duvonlighting.com/free-quote.